20 attorneys general ask federal judge to reverse deep cuts to US Health and Human Services
Context:
Nineteen state attorneys general, alongside Washington D.C., have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration's significant cuts to the U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS), accusing it of dismantling essential health programs and leaving states to manage increasing health crises. The lawsuit, led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, criticizes the restructuring carried out by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., which eliminated over 10,000 jobs and consolidated 28 agencies into 15, thereby stripping 25% of the HHS workforce. The initiative, part of the 'Make America Healthy Again' directive, is claimed to have severely impacted critical services, including testing for infectious diseases and tracking cancer risks, and has threatened the functioning of early childhood programs and maternal health monitoring. The attorneys argue that the reorganization, which also affected the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's operations, was an intentional move that undermines the department's foundational duties. They seek judicial intervention to overturn the directive, asserting that the administration overstepped its authority by disbanding congressionally established programs and funding without consent.
Dive Deeper:
Attorneys general from 19 states and Washington, D.C., are legally contesting the Trump administration's restructuring of the U.S. Health and Human Services, which they claim has led to the dismantling of crucial health programs and increased responsibility on states for emerging health issues.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Rhode Island, is spearheaded by New York Attorney General Letitia James and is supported by attorneys general from various states including Arizona, California, and Illinois, who argue that the cuts have been detrimental to public health infrastructure.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. implemented a restructuring plan in March, which resulted in the loss of over 10,000 jobs and the consolidation of 28 agencies into 15 within HHS, with the stated goal of streamlining operations and reducing redundancies.
The restructuring, part of the 'Make America Healthy Again' directive, has been criticized for severely affecting the ability of labs to conduct disease testing, halting cancer risk monitoring programs, and leaving early childhood and maternal health programs in financial uncertainty.
The attorneys general assert that the reorganization has intentionally undermined the core functions of HHS, particularly impacting the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's ability to manage a significant measles outbreak, and demand judicial intervention to rescind the directive.
They argue that the administration's unilateral actions in eliminating congressionally funded and established programs are unlawful, emphasizing the dismantling of the team managing federal poverty guidelines and the gutting of the tobacco prevention agency.
The Trump administration is already facing multiple legal challenges over its public health agency cuts, including a recent lawsuit by 23 states against the $11 billion reduction in federal funding for COVID-19 and other public health initiatives.