News Page

Main Content

A Year Ago, Columbia Security Was Hands-Off at a Protest. Not This Time.

The New York Times's profile
The New York Times
4h ago
A Year Ago, Columbia Security Was Hands-Off at a Protest. Not This Time.

Context:

At Columbia University, a pro-Palestinian protest took a dramatic turn when demonstrators occupied the main library, prompting a forceful response from campus security and the police, resulting in numerous arrests. Unlike a similar event a year ago, this time Columbia's unarmed public safety officers actively intervened, using newly granted powers to arrest demonstrators and prevent further escalation. The university's response, which was praised by some as timely and assertive, has also drawn criticism from those who believe the protesters were met with unnecessary force. The Columbia University Apartheid Divest group has become more radical in its rhetoric, further complicating the university's handling of such protests amidst federal scrutiny. The incident has heightened tensions, with potential implications for international students involved in protests, who face risks of suspension or deportation under new disciplinary measures.

Dive Deeper:

  • Columbia University's main library was occupied by pro-Palestinian demonstrators, leading to a standoff that lasted several hours and culminated in arrests by campus security and police. This marked a stark contrast to a similar protest a year prior, where a less forceful approach was taken.

  • Campus security, who are unarmed, played an active role in managing the protest by blocking exit routes and locking doors, using newly granted authority to detain participants before police involvement, highlighting a shift in the university's approach to managing disruptive protests.

  • The university's decisive actions were praised by the Trump administration's antisemitism task force, which had previously criticized Columbia for its handling of protests, leading to a suspension of over $400 million in research funding. Columbia is currently negotiating to have these funds restored.

  • Despite the assertive response, there was significant backlash from those who felt the actions taken against unarmed demonstrators were excessive. The protest group, Columbia University Apartheid Divest, remained defiant, refusing to comply with identity checks and condemning the university's approach.

  • The protest resulted in injuries on both sides, with security officers hurt during crowd surges and demonstrators reportedly injured, including one taken out on a stretcher. The protest also involved vandalism, with graffiti slogans found throughout the library, leading to overnight repairs.

  • Columbia is revising its disciplinary procedures by moving the judicial board overseeing protests to the provost’s office, aiming for swifter disciplinary actions in response to federal demands for tighter control.

  • The involvement of international students in the protest has raised stakes, as they now face the possibility of deportation, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio indicating a review of visa statuses, although city rules limit information sharing between local authorities and immigration enforcement.

Latest News

Related Stories