News Page

Main Content

Closing arguments set in trial of man accused of killing UNC student in 2012

ABC News's profile
Original Story by ABC News
October 22, 2026
Closing arguments set in trial of man accused of killing UNC student in 2012

Context:

Closing arguments are anticipated in the 2012 murder of UNC student Faith Hedgepeth, with the defendant, Miguel Salguero Olivares, facing first-degree murder, rape, and burglary charges after being linked to the crime by DNA evidence. The prosecution has presented about two dozen witnesses over a lengthy trial that began with jury selection in October, outlining Hedgepeth’s last night and the brutality of her death, while arguing that Olivares acted as a stranger killer. The defense challenged the reliability and handling of evidence, including DNA analyses and crime-scene processing. Momentum in the case hinges on the strength of the DNA links and how jurors weigh the various testimonies, with a verdict expected after the closing arguments. The timeframe centers on the 2012 incident and the long-delayed pursuit of justice, with prosecutors and defense presenting competing interpretations of the same forensic and testimonial record.

Dive Deeper:

  • Faith Hedgepeth, 19, a UNC Chapel Hill sophomore, was killed in September 2012 in her off-campus apartment, with autopsy revealing severe skull fractures and extensive injuries.

  • Miguel Salguero Olivares was arrested nine years later after a DWI stop led to a DNA sample that prosecutors say matches evidence from the crime scene; he has pleaded not guilty.

  • Nearly two dozen witnesses testified for the prosecution, including Hedgepeth’s roommate, crime scene technicians, law enforcement, and a DNA expert, outlining Hedgepeth’s last night and the circumstances of the death.

  • DNA testimony asserted that Hedgepeth’s DNA was 170 septillion times more likely to be mixed with Salguero Olivares’s than with an unknown person on her body, and a rum bottle DNA was 48.6 tredecillion times more likely to be from both together than from two unrelated individuals.

  • Defense cross-examination focused on Rosario’s account of the events, limitations in crime-scene processing, and potential issues with the DNA evidence, including gaps in blood evidence.

  • Jurors reportedly cried during autopsy photos, and Salguero Olivares cried during a jailhouse-call video played for the jury, underscoring the emotional weight of the testimony.

Latest News

Related Stories