Context:

The Harvey Weinstein rape retrial ended in a mistrial after jurors could not reach a unanimous verdict, prompting a June 24 hearing on whether prosecutors will pursue a fourth trial. This marks the third trial over allegations that Weinstein raped actress Jessica Mann in 2013, with a prior conviction overturned and a second trial in 2025 ending in deadlock. Mann testified that she repeatedly said no and tried to leave while Weinstein blocked her exit and grabbed her arm, though Weinstein’s lawyers argued the encounter was consensual. Weinstein remains imprisoned for other sex crimes, with the possibility of another proceeding looming. The outcome underscores the high-stakes, prolonged battle over accountability in this case and the likelihood of further legal maneuvering.

Dive Deeper:

• Jurors notified the court that they could not reach a unanimous verdict, triggering a mistrial on the third day of deliberations; the judge then urged continued deliberations before declaring the deadlock.

• This is Weinstein’s third trial related to accusations by Jessica Mann, who testified that he assaulted her in a New York hotel room in 2013; the case follows a 2020 rape conviction that was overturned and a 2025 trial that ended without a verdict on Mann’s rape count.

• Mann described repeated refusals to have sex and attempts to leave, but Weinstein allegedly blocked her exit and grabbed her arm; defense argued the encounter was consensual and noted their earlier close relationship.

• Weinstein’s defense pointed to a 2017 email in which Mann wrote, 'I love you, always do. But I hate feeling like a booty call,' as context for their relationship and interactions.

• Weinstein has already been convicted of other sex crimes and remains incarcerated, with prosecutors awaiting guidance on whether to pursue a fourth trial in this case.

• A June 24 hearing is scheduled to determine if prosecutors will move forward with another trial, reflecting the ongoing legal strategy and potential timelines for resolution.

• Media sources cited include the Associated Press and The New York Times, underscoring ongoing coverage and contested narrative around the allegations and courtroom proceedings.