Context:

Rodney Hinton Jr. faces an aggravated murder charge for allegedly intentionally hitting and killing a Hamilton County sheriff's deputy with a car after his son, Ryan Hinton, was shot by police. At a court hearing in Cincinnati, Hinton Jr. was denied bond, with the judge ordering remand and mental health treatment. The incident began after Hinton Jr. watched body camera footage of his son's shooting, which left him distraught. His attorney argues that Hinton Jr. should be seen as someone with mental illness rather than a 'cop-killer,' citing his lack of previous felony convictions and family ties. Meanwhile, the family of Ryan Hinton seeks more information surrounding his death and has requested police footage and reports for review.

Dive Deeper:

• Rodney Hinton Jr. was charged with aggravated murder for allegedly killing Hamilton County Sheriff's Deputy Larry Henderson by intentionally driving into him with a vehicle. The court denied him bail, citing his mental health as a concern and the potential risk he poses to public safety.

• The case developed after Cincinnati police shot Hinton Jr.'s son, Ryan Hinton, who was fleeing from police in a stolen car and appeared to be armed. The event left Hinton Jr. visibly distraught after seeing the body-worn camera footage of his son's death.

• The prosecution presented evidence suggesting Hinton Jr. intentionally drove his vehicle directly at Deputy Henderson without attempting to stop, citing witness statements and lack of skid marks.

• Hinton Jr.'s defense attorney, Clyde Bennett II, pleaded not guilty on his behalf, arguing that Hinton Jr.'s actions were influenced by mental illness and should not categorize him as a 'cop-killer.'

• During the court proceedings, a disturbance occurred when a man shouted in the gallery, leading to a brief interruption. The man was not identified as Hinton Jr.'s brother, despite his claim.

• The family of Ryan Hinton is actively seeking answers regarding his death and has filed a request for the release of body camera footage and police reports related to the incident.

• The case highlights the complex interplay of mental health considerations, legal accountability, and the pursuit of transparency in law enforcement activities.