Context:

President Trump expressed discontent over networks and late-night shows that are predominantly critical of him, especially following the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel's show by ABC. He indicated that networks with overwhelmingly negative coverage might risk having their licenses revoked, a decision he suggested would be up to FCC Chair Brendan Carr. Trump has criticized the lack of conservative representation in late-night programming, suggesting these shows act as partisan arms against him. The fairness doctrine, which Trump seemed to reference, was abolished in 1987, but he alluded to its principles to justify his stance. The controversy surrounding Kimmel's suspension stemmed from his comments about the shooting of Charlie Kirk, sparking debates about media bias and licensing implications.

Dive Deeper:

• President Trump criticized networks and late-night shows for being overwhelmingly negative towards him, particularly pointing to ABC's indefinite suspension of Jimmy Kimmel's show as a catalyst for his remarks.

• He suggested that networks with predominantly negative coverage against him might face the revocation of their broadcasting licenses, a decision he implied would be up to Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr, whom he praised.

• Trump highlighted the lack of conservative voices in late-night programming, arguing that these shows function as extensions of the Democratic Party and should be scrutinized for licensing.

• The fairness doctrine, which required networks to present diverse viewpoints and was abolished in 1987, was indirectly referenced by Trump as he argued for more balanced media representation.

• Kimmel's suspension by ABC followed his controversial remarks about the shooting of Charlie Kirk, co-founder of Turning Point USA, leading to criticism from conservatives and discussions about media impartiality.

• Trump has a history of criticizing late-night hosts like Kimmel and previously celebrated CBS's decision to cancel 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert', suggesting similar actions for other hosts critical of him.

• The debate over Kimmel's suspension and media criticism underscores ongoing tensions about perceived media bias and the implications for broadcasting licenses.